Legal Opinion

McCarty v. City of Frankfort

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1921No. 10,721PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Clinton Circuit Court; James P. Wason, Special Judge. Action by the City of Frankfort against Milton T. McCarty and wife. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, J.

The town, now city, of Frankfort was laid out, and the plat thereof duly acknowledged and recorded in the office of the recorder of Clinton county, Indiana, in July, 1830. The county commissioners of said county had theretofore appointed one William Douglass as agent for said county, to lay out said town, and to lay off the same into town lots, streets and alleys. On June 9, 1830, the lands contained in the plat of the original town had been conveyed by the owners thereof “to Joseph Hill, John Douglass, and Mordecai McKinsey, commissioners of Clinton county, Indiana, and their successors in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McCormick v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  2. Common Council v. CroasIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. FrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  4. Reilly v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Shea v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. County of Yuma v. LeidendekerArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gibson v. OckerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Walmer v. Town of BremenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API