Legal Opinion

Connor v. Connor

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 22, 1964No. File 102523PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzGerald, J.

The within action is one in which the plaintiff, by way of equitable relief, is seeking a partition of certain land, with buildings and other improvements thereon, located in Guilford and alleged to be in the possession of the parties as joint tenants with right of survivorship, each of them having an estate in fee in an undivided one-half part thereof, or, in the alternative, a sale of the premises and a division of the proceeds between the parties according to their rights. As drawn, the complaint and prayers for relief are patterned upon Form No. 399 of the 1963 Practice Book.

In response…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. OlmstedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
  2. Rayhol Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Gaer Bros., Inc. v. MottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  4. Jennings v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  5. Klaus v. KlausSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MosolowitzDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
  2. Lovejoy v. LovejoyConnecticut Superior Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API