Legal Opinion
Howard McGehee and Justine McGehee v. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 25, 1984No. 83-1536, 83-1609PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir., R. 10(e). The cause is therefore submitted without oral argument.
The plaintiffs-appellants sued Farmers Insurance Company on a fire insurance policy. The district court gave summary judgment for the defendant on the ground that the plaintiffs had no insurable interest in the premises insured. They appeal.
The plaintiffs are the named…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Security Insurance Company Of New Haven v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Snethen v. Oklahoma State Union of the Farmers Educational & Cooperative UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- R. J. Enstrom Corporation v. Interceptor Corporation and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Ernie Miller Pontiac, Inc. v. Home Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Firemen's Fund Ins. Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gary Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Technical Land, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Southeastern Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Gary Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987