Legal Opinion
Ernie Miller Pontiac, Inc. v. Home Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 1, 1975No. 47465PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice:
Ernie Miller Pontiac, Inc., (plaintiff below) appeals from an adverse judgment denying it any recovery against The Home Insurance Company (defendant) in an action to recover on an insurance policy (issued by defendant) for loss because of a stolen automobile. We will refer to the parties by their trial court designation.
The undisputed facts are as follows: a few days before June 26, 1972 in Tulsa, Oklahoma, one Daniels offered to sell to plaintiff a Chevrolet red Malibu automobile and tendered a title bearing the ID number visible on the vehicle; plaintiff bought the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Al's Auto Sales v. MoskowitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Hessen v. Iowa Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Gordon v. Gulf American Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Skaff v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Adkisson v. WaitmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Reznick v. Home Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Snethen v. Oklahoma State Union of the Farmers Educational & Cooperative UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Webb v. M.F.A. Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SisemoreOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Howard McGehee and Justine McGehee v. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.