Legal Opinion

Karen Condit and Mary E. Oravec v. United Air Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 28, 1977No. 76-2296PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Karen Condit, a stewardess representing a class composed of herself and all others similarly situated, and Mary E. Oravec, an intervenor, appeal from an order of the district court holding that the maternity leave policy of United Air Lines, Inc., constitutes a bona fide occupational qualification under § 703(e) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(e)). We affirm.

United requires that all stewardesses discontinue flying as soon as they become aware that they are pregnant. The stewardesses contend that each stewardess should be allowed to continue…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leonard v. National Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1977

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Boynton Cab Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Catherine M. BURWELL Et Al., Appellees, v. EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  4. Harriss v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
  5. In re National Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API