Legal Opinion

United States v. Holman

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1980No. Crim. 79-139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

John Holman, Ismael Pagan Quinones, and ten other persons were indicted for conspiring to engage in the unlawful traffic of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), 843(b) and 952(a). Holman and Ismael Quinones were also charged with engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848. In addition, there were nine counts of aiding and abetting the possession of heroin with the intent of distributing it in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, brought against various defendants. On September 6, 1979, I…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. VastolaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
  2. United States v. GattoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  3. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Karen Bags, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  4. United States v. FerrsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. United States v. SuquetDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API