Legal Opinion
United States v. Gatto
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 4, 1990No. Cr. A. 89-250(SSB)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE.
A. Defendant Frank Camiscioli, Jr.
B. Defendant Peter Mylenki.
C. Defendant William Odierno.
D. Defendant Alan Grecco.
E. Defendant Joseph Gatto.
F. Defendant Louis Gatto Sr.
G. Defendant Louis Gatto Jr.
H. Defendant Stefano Mazzola.
II. DISCUSSION.
A. Motions for Severance .
1. Prejudicial Joinder.
2. Need for Exculpatory Testimony.
B. Motions Attacking the Indictment.
1. Motion to Strike Violent Acts from Indictment.
2. RICO’s “Pattern of Racketeering” Requirement is Unconstitutionally Vague.
3. Motion to Strike Prejudicial Surplusage.
a. Reference to the “Gatto…
2Cases cited128 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Mitchell Antar, in 94-5228. United States of America v. Eddie Antar, in 94-5230Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. EisenbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- United States v. GiampaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- United States v. Darin L. HedgepethCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. CherryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.