Snedaker & Co. v. Wayne Title & Trust Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Keller, P. J.,
Opinion by
This is an instance where legal procedure intended to simplify and expedite litigation has been used to complicate and delay it.
The action was a simple one in assumpsit, (brought March 11, 1938, writ served on defendant with a copy of plaintiff’s statement on March 18, 1938), on a written contract, in the nature of an insurance contract, under which the defendant became surety to the plaintiff, a sub-contractor, for the payment of the agreed contract price by the general contractor, who was building a house for one Stanley J. Miller and his wife. The plaintiff had…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Vinnacombe v. Phila. Am. S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- O'CONNELL v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Bailey v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- First Nat. Bk. of Pittsburgh v. BairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DeLuca v. Fidelity BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Miller Et Ux. v. Wayne Title Tr. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943