Legal Opinion

Cade v. Vickers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1912No. 1262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Woods County; R. H. Loofbourrow, Judge: Action by C. M. Cade against Blanche Vickers and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This proceeding in error is to review the judgment of an action wherein the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, sued the defendants in error, Blanche Vickers, Don Vick-ers, and Florence Westfall, respectively the widow and children of G. W. Vickers, deceased, to foreclose a lien on certain lots in the city of Alva, by virtue of a mortgage executed by the said deceased on the 6th day of June, 1903. Said decedent, on said date, for value, executed and delivered to said plaintiff his certain promissory note, in writing, in the sum of $500, due on the 6th day of September, 1903, providing for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northwest Thresher Co. v. McCarroll Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Tracy v. HarbinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ticer v. State Ex Rel. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Mothersead v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API