Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 26-88, (1988)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided June 3, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE E. RICE, Acting Corporation Counsel Milwaukee County

You ask two questions concerning the procedure for letting public works contracts involving the expenditure of budgeted county funds for museum and zoological operations in Milwaukee County.

Your first question may be restated as follows:

Under existing statutes and ordinances, do the Milwaukee County Museum Board of Trustees and the Milwaukee County Zoological Board of Trustees have the exclusive authority to award contracts for public works projects within their respective supervisory functions?

I decline to answer this question since…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Historical Society of Wisconsin v. Village of Maple BluffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Opinion No. Oag 15-87, (1987), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1987
  3. Opinion No. Oag 123-79, (1979), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1979
  4. Opinion No. Oag 6-88, (1988), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Opinion No. Oag 33-88, (1988), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1988
  2. Opinion No. Oag 29-89, (1989), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API