Legal Opinion
Nike, Inc. v. Wu
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided September 25, 2018No. 13cv08012 (CM) (DF)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge
After the Court granted a default judgment (the "Judgment" (Dkt. 49) ) in favor of plaintiffs Nike, Inc. and Converse Inc. (together, "Plaintiffs") in this trademark-infringement action, Plaintiffs assigned their interest in the Judgment to Next Investments, LLC (the "Assignee"), and the matter has recently been before the Court in connection with the Assignee's efforts to enforce the Judgment against the defendant judgment debtors ("Defendants" or the "Judgment Debtors") and disputes related to those efforts. In particular, the Honorable Colleen…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nike, Inc. v. WuDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Next Investments, LLC v. Bank of ChinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- In re Grand Jury Investigation of Possible Violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 and 50 U.S.C. § 1705Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Gugino v. City of BuffaloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Inventus Power, Inc. v. Shenzhen Ace Battery Co., Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.