Legal Opinion

Inventus Power, Inc. v. Shenzhen Ace Battery Co., Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 30, 2021No. 1:20-cv-03375Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION INVENTUS POWER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 20 CV 3375 ) SHENZHEN ACE BATTERY, ) Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr. ) Defendant. ) Magistrate Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motion to compel depositions under the Federal Rules (Dckt. #86) is granted, defendant’s motion to apply the Hague Evidence Convention to requests for production (Dckt. #105) is denied, and defendant’s motion to take deposition of Wenhua (Ewin) Li under the Hague…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Flamingo Trails No. 7 Landscape Maintenance Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
  3. Holocaust Victims of v. OTP BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Ralphael Okoro v. Randall BohmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Motorola Solutions, Inc. v. Hytera Commc'ns Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API