Legal Opinion

Powalka v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1968No. 78PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*155Robert W. Hansen, J.

If the medical examiner did not make a statement of fitness for insurance, statements by the insured which were false and increased the risk destroy the right of the widow to recover on the policy.1

If, however, the medical examiner made a statement of fitness for insurance, or issued a certification as to the health of the insured, then the insurance company can defeat recovery on the policy only if it can establish actual fraud or deceit on the part of the insured.2

If see. 209.06, Stats., applies in this case, material misrepresentations defeat recovery. If sec. 209.07…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Monahan v. Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Frozena v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Platke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Drexler v. ZohlenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Gibson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grosse v. Protective Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Grosse v. Protective Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Powalka v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Rauch v. American Family InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Rauch v. American Family InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API