Frozena v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed March 7, 1933:
Wickhem, J.
The plaintiff contends that the jury’s finding that the insured did not make any of the false representations in the application with intent to deceive is sustained by the evidence, and that the element of fraud is thus eliminated from the case. This being true, the plaintiff relies upon sec. 209.07, Stats., which provides as follows :
“In any case where the medical examiner, or physician acting as such, of any life or disability insurance company or association doing business in this state, shall issue a certificate of health or declare…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Demirjian v. New York Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Monahan v. Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Conklin v. New York Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by11 opinions
- Grosse v. Protective Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Platke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Gibson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Jespersen v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Kelly v. Madison National Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.