Monahan v. Mutual Life Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
It is conceded that the medical examiner of appellant issued a certificate of health declaring the applicant a fit subject for insurance and so reported to the company. Appellant defends this action on the ground that the insured was not in proper health and was not a fit subject for insurance either at the time of the application or at the time of the issuance and delivery of the policy. By the provisions of sec. 209.07, Stats., the appellant is estopped “from setting up in defense of an action on such policy or certificate that the insured was not in the condition of health required by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McGowan v. Supreme Court of the Independent Order of ForestersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Roe v. National Life Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
3Cited by12 opinions
- Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. DoyleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
- Great Southern Life Insurance v. DoyleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Stebane Nash Co. v. Campbellsport Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Powalka v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Demirjian v. New York Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.