Legal Opinion
Archer v. Rockingham County
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided July 3, 2001No. COA00-793PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCullough, Judge.
Plaintiffs are twelve former and current emergency medical technicians (EMTs) who work in Rockingham County, North Carolina. Sometime in the mid-1980s, the County began paying the full-time EMTs according to the “fluctuating workweek pay plan.” This pay schedule is a recognized method of compensation under the federal Fair Labor and Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) and is codified in 29 C.F.R. § 778.114 (2000). This compensation scheme assists employers in calculating an employee’s regular and overtime pay rates and operates in situations where an employee works a different…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- McMillian v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Paquette v. County of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Dawes v. Nash CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- Eastway Wrecker Service, Inc. v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Can Am South, LLC v. State, North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Cockrell v. Board of Regents of New Mexico State UniversityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.