Legal Opinion

Smith v. J.G.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2008No. 20070123PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] J.G. (“Mother”1) appeals the juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights to her two minor children, J.S. (“Sam”) and J.G. (“George”). We conclude the juvenile court did not err in finding the children have been deprived, the causes and conditions of deprivation are likely to continue, and, as a result of the continued deprivation, Sam and George have suffered or will probably suffer serious physical, mental or emotional harm if Mother’s parental rights are not terminated. Further, the juvenile court did not err in finding reasonable efforts were made to preserve…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In the Interest of T.F. v. Director, Traill County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Olson v. T.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Boehmer v. T.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. ObrigewitchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Dvorak v. S.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grand Forks County Social Services v. T.L.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In the Interest of AbNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Rhodenbaugh v. RhodenbaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Feickert v. FeickertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API