Legal Opinion

Olson v. T.K.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2001No. Nos. 20000328, 20000329PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] M.F. (“Mary”)1 appealed from orders terminating her parental rights to her children, T.K. (“Tim”) and D.F. (“David”). We hold there is clear and convincing evidence the children are deprived, the causes and conditions of the deprivation are likely to continue, and, as a result of the continued deprivation, the children will probably suffer serious physical, mental, or emotional harm if Mary’s parental rights are not terminated. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On appeal, Mary asserts the State has failed, to prove the three elements for parental termination by clear and convincing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McBeth v. J.J.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. McBeth v. M.D.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Dvorak v. S.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Cleveland v. R.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Cleveland v. T.V.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Boehmer v. T.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Knoll ex rel. Cass County Social Services v. D.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bernhardt v. K.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Interest of E.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Rohr v. J.R.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API