Boehmer v. T.A.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] B.J. (“Brian” 1) appeals the juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights to his three minor children, S.A. (“Sarah”), D.J. (“Doug”), and J.A. (“Jenny”). We hold the juvenile court did not err in finding clear and convincing evidence the children have been deprived; the causes and conditions of deprivation are likely to continue; and, as a result of the continued deprivation, Sarah, Doug, and Jenny have suffered or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, or emotional harm if Brian’s parental rights are not terminated. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Brian is the biological…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In the Matter of Adoption of SrfNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- In the Interest of T.F. v. Director, Traill County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Olson v. T.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Interest of E.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Rohr v. J.R.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
3Cited by32 opinions
- Sand v. R.J.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. T.L.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Adoption of HGCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Mattison v. B.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- S.H.B. v. T.A.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.