Legal Opinion

Grussing v. Kvam Implement Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 3, 1991No. C0-91-947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

The state appeals from an order of the district court denying a motion to quash a subpoena of a Minnesota OSHA investigator for appearance at deposition and trial. The district court found the statute providing investigators a privilege from subpoena was unconstitutional under the due process and separation of powers provisions of the Minnesota and U.S. Constitutions. We reverse.

FACTS

Richard Grussing was killed in a work-related accident at a Jennie-0 Foods facility. A Minnesota OSHA investigation of the accident was performed by Debra Peterson, an employee of that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of BloomingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Lukkason v. 1993 Chevrolet Extended Cab PickupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. County of Stearns v. BarnellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API