Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Crist v. Bomar

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice BubNett

The plaintiff in error was the petitioner in this case for what he styled a writ of mandamus. After hearing this petition the trial judge denied the petition and an ap*422peal was seasonably perfected. Tbe trial judge appointed counsel for tbe petitioner in tbe trial court, but tbis counsel did not appear in this Court and the petitioner has well represented himself.

Tbe appeal and tbe question involved, as set forth by tbe various petitions of the petitioner herein, is to tbe effect that tbe judgment of tbe trial court wherein be was sentenced for third degree burglary should be credited with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bomar v. State Ex Rel. StewartTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Ex parte VanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Volker v. McDonaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Douglass v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fletcher Whaley Long v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State Ex Rel. Ivey v. MeadowsTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. SilvaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  4. State v. GipsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API