Bomar v. State Ex Rel. Stewart
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson
By means of petiton for writ of habeas corpus Stewart sought release from the penitentiary on the ground that he was being illegally restrained. The illegality alleged is that the' judgments under the authority of which he was being held were “void on their face”. They were three separate judgments of the Criminal Court of Montgomery County reciting that Stewart, appearing “in person and by counsel and * * * being arraigned at the bar, plead guilty” to (1) kidnapping, (2) armed robbery and (3) grand larceny, as charged in the respective indictments. The specific illegality alleged is that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jordan v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- Brewer v. GriggsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
- Puckett v. WynnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Pope v. HarrisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1885
- Edwards v. PuckettTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Passarella v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- State v. RitchieTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. McClintockTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Holbrook v. BomarTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Shepard v. HendersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.