State v. Gipson

OPINION

WELLES, Judge.

These are appeals pursuant to Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. Each Defendant appeals from separate orders of the trial court finding him to be an habitual traffic offender.1 On appeal, each Defendant argues that the trial court erred by not dismissing the State’s petition to have him declared an habitual offender on the grounds that the petition was barred by the District Attorney General’s delay in bringing the petition or by the equitable doctrine of laches. We disagree and affirm the judgments of the trial court.

The underlying facts are not in…