Legal Opinion

Masters v. Hassenpflug

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold J. Hughes, J.

The issue presented on this motion is whether CPLR 3101 (subd [g]) (L 1980, ch 283) providing for disclosure of any written report of an accident prepared in the regular course of business requires the disclosure of a party’s report of an accident to his insurance carrier.

This is an action for personal injuries allegedly arising from the collision of a vehicle owned and operated by Raymon Masters, in which Kathleen Mayberry was a passenger, and an automobile owned and operated by defendant Hassenpflug. It is alleged that Hassenpflug’s insurer,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kandel v. TocherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  2. Pataki v. KisedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Chaplin v. Pathmark SupermarketsNew York Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vandenburgh v. Columbia Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Harris v. Processed Wood, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Vogl v. Joyce Kilmer Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Smith v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Montag v. Young Men's Christian Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API