Legal Opinion
Chaplin v. Pathmark Supermarkets
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
James F. Niehoff, J.
This is a motion by defendants for a protective order vacating the plaintiffs’ notice for discovery and inspection which demands the right to discover “Accident reports of employees pursuant to C.P.L.R. 3101(g) re the accident of August 24, 1978.”
The underlying action is one by Mimi Chaplin for personal injuries allegedly sustained on August 24, 1978 at the defendant’s premises as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendant. It is claimed that she was caused to fall as the result of the presence of sour cream on the floor.
Newly enacted CPLR 3101…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kandel v. TocherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Mold Maintenance Service v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Chemical Bank v. National Union Fire Ins.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Millen Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Carlo v. Queens Transit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vernet v. GilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Vandenburgh v. Columbia Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Masters v. HassenpflugNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Ellis v. County of BroomeNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Stein v. Trump Village Section No. 4, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.