Legal Opinion

Montag v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John R. Tenney, J.

In this case, the right to examine statements or reports made by an insured to an insurance company is placed at issue. There are three written reports involved. One is a note allegedly sent by an employee to the defendant’s executive director. Since the affidavits indicate that this note is not available, it will not be considered in this proceeding. The other two statements were prepared at the insistence of the defendant’s insurance carrier. Thus, in this case there is brought into issue an apparent conflict between CPLR 3101 (subd [d]) and 3101 (subd…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hoenig v. WestphalNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Kandel v. TocherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  3. Pataki v. KisedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Finegold v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  5. Weisgold v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API