Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Schmidt

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the CourtCushing, J.

The city of Cincinnati brought action in the court of common pleas to appropriate property for the purpose of widening and straightening Ludlow avenue from Cornell place to the Ludlow avenue viaduct. In that proceeding the city acquired the fee simple title to the forty-five pieces of property included in the proceeding. The verdict and judgment recited that the buildings situated on parcels Nos. 11 and 25 were not included in the verdict. Subsequently, on February 11, 1920, the city moved to dismiss Mary Cunningham, who claimed an interest in parcel No. 11, and *427Firman Barratt, who claimed an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schreiber v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Chicago, Evanston & Lake Superior Railroad v. Catholic BishopIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mississippi State Highway Commission v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Lewiston Pre-Mix Concrete, Inc. v. RohdeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Clark v. BlackOhio Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Gafney Press, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API