Legal Opinion

Chicago, Evanston & Lake Superior Railroad v. Catholic Bishop

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richard Peendeegast, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

delivered the opinion of the Court.:

This is a proceeding, instituted in the county court of Cook county by the appellant railroad company, under the Eminent Domain act, for the purpose of condemning a piece of land, owned by the appellee, “the Catholic Bishop of Chicago, ” a corporation sole. The appellees, Bairstow and Moore, claim to be lessees of portions of the premises, and, also, to be the owners of certain improvements thereon. The property, sought to be condemned, is a narrow strip of ground, 585T-^ feet long, and about 40 or 41 feet wide, situated on the west side of the main road…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schreiber v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Haslam v. Galena & Southern Wisconsin R. R.Illinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ranck v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. City of Chicago v. McCauslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Oregon Short Line R. Co. v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Ralph v. HazenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  5. City of Houston v. DerbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API