Legal Opinion

Juge v. County of Sacramento

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 1993No. C012776PublishedCited by 36 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, J.

This case involves the pleading and notice requirements of a summary judgment proceeding, We are presented with the question whether the trial court may grant a motion for summary judgment upon a ground of law not explicitly tendered by the moving party, i.e., a ground of law identified by the trial court rather than by the movant, if application of that law to an undisputed material fact put in issue by the parties’ separate statements of undisputed material facts is dispositive of a cause of action presented by the pleadings.

To answer this question, we first examine the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lona v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Noe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Susag v. City of Lake ForestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Westlye v. Look Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API