Legal Opinion

Murr v. Landrum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1959No. 38263PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

This action was commenced by E. G. Murr and N. C. Matthews, as plaintiffs, to recover from defendant in error, as defendant, a real estate broker’s commission in the amount of $5,950, which plaintiffs alleged defendant owed them for procuring a purchaser for defendant’s ranch, under the terms of an oral contract. Before the case came to trial, one of the original plaintiffs, Matthews, was dismissed from the action upon Murr’s motion representing that he had assigned his interest in the contract to said movant. After Murr thus became the only plaintiff in the action, he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. RyanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. McGlone v. LandrethSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Pfrimmer v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Herman v. HassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Armstrong v. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horn v. SturmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Worthington v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Horn v. SturmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Minnesota Paints, Inc. v. JohnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API