Herman v. Hass
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hardin District Court. — Hon. C. G-. Lee, Judge. Action at law upon an account for merchandise sold and delivered. The defendant pleaded a general denial, and by amendment pleaded that some of the goods were worthless, and were returned to the plaintiff on that account. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. Thereupon the defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which was sustained. From the order granting a new trial, the plaintiff has appealed.-
1Opinion of the CourtEvaNS, J.
The plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of fur garments in Detroit, Mich. The defendant is a retail dealer in Eldora, Iowa. The plaintiff introduced evidence in support of its petition tending to show that it had sold and delivered to the defendant upon his order three bills of goods amounting to a total of $140.83. The verdict in its favor was for such amount. Much of the evidence of the plaintiff was introduced over appropriate objections by the defendant. Several of the grounds of the motion for 1. Nnw trial : peaCiretlon: ap" new trial by defendant were based upon the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Spry v. LamontSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Steensland v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Nassif v. PipkinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Jones v. Iowa State Highway Commission Ex Rel. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.