Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 7, 1993No. 14677PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

In this certified appeal, we granted permission to appeal limited to two issues, one concerning the timeliness of a challenge to the imposition of a fine on an arguably indigent defendant, and the other concerning the constitutionality of a jury instruction on reasonable doubt.1 The defendant, Roscoe Johnson, was convicted, after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell, in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a).2 The trial court sentenced the defendant to the statutory maximum of fifteen years *61imprisonment and imposed a fine of $50,000. The Appellate Court affirmed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Moscone v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. HansenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. State v. ZolloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. State v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API