Legal Opinion

State v. Soltis

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 2002No. A-01-699, A-01-700PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hannon, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Ann R. Soltis appeals from an order overruling her motion for discharge. Soltis was charged by complaint with a Class I misdemeanor on February 8, 2000. On August 31, 2000, Soltis filed a motion for discharge alleging that the State had not brought her to trial within the statutorily prescribed time under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1207 (Reissue 1995). The county court overruled the motion, and the district court affirmed. We find that the State failed to introduce evidence which would extend the allowable trial time to the date to which the trial was set. We therefore…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. AndersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. AlvarezNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. SumstineNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ChaseNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. CastilloNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. RiegerNebraska Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. WashingtonNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. WashingtonNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API