Legal Opinion

State v. Castillo

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 2003No. A-02-235PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Irwin, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Louie A. Castillo appeals from an order of the district court overruling his motion for absolute discharge. Castillo’s motion for absolute discharge was made on statutory grounds only. Because we find that Castillo’s statutory right to a speedy trial was not violated, we affirm.

II. BACKGROUND

On April 26, 2001, the State filed an information against Castillo. On May 4, Castillo filed a motion for discovery, which motion was disposed of by the court on May 17. On August 29, Castillo filed a motion to suppress evidence, which motion was overruled by the court on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. SumstineNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. TuckerNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BorlandNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State v. SoltisNebraska Court of Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WashingtonNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. WashingtonNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Dugan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. CollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API