State of Minnesota v. Leona Rose deLottinville
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODENBERG, Judge.
The state appeals after the district court dismissed its complaint against respondent. It argues that the district court erred in ruling that police officers violated respondent’s Fourth Amendment rights when they entered a third-party’s residence to arrest respondent under a valid warrant while she was present as a guest. 1 We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Respondent Leona Rose deLottinville, who maintained her own permanent residence in a nearby town, had been staying with D.R. intermittently for about one week when two officers of the Drug Task Force came to D.R.’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Leona Rose deLottinvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Leona Rose deLottinvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017