Emerson Electric Co. v. Powers
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Howard, Jr. Judge.
Appellee sustained a compensable injury to his eye when hot metallic aluminum splashed in his face. Since the accident, appellant has not been able to judge distance and read signs along the highway; he has a nervous condition and his ability to drive an automobile has been affected appreciably.
Dr. Bobby Earl McKee, an ophthalmologist,1 testified that while appellee had an estimated impairment of 8.5% to the right eye and 16.4% impairment to the left eye, these figures did not actually represent the total visual impairment sustained by the claimant; that claimant’s…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Paper Company v. TidwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Coffman v. City of PulaskiTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
- Vishney v. Empire Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Alabama By-Products Corporation v. WintersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Consumers Co-Operative Ass'n v. TitusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. RisperCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996