Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Milk Commission
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided March 29, 1935PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.
The appellants were perpetually enjoined and restrained from distributing milk in the city of Staunton until they shall have received a license from the Milk Commission, and from selling milk in the Staunton-Waynesboro market area at any other price than that fixed by the Commission. They were also required to pay any and all assessments levied upon them under the authority of the Commission. It is of the decree carrying the injunction into effect that the appellants complain.
*960The pleadings in the case consist of the bill of complaint filed by the Milk Commission and the answer thereto filed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- People v. NebbiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Highland Farms Dairy, Inc. v. AgnewSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Ray v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Franklin v. State Ex Rel. Alabama State Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.