Roderick Wilson v. C.M. Lensing and Attorney General of Louisiana
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioner-Appellant Roderick Wilson complains that the federal district court erred in denying his petition for habeas corpus grounded in the Constitution’s prohibition against ex post facto laws. Finding that the district court correctly determined that Wilson had not been subjected to an ex post facto violation by retroactive application of Louisiana’s amendment of a statute affecting the jurisdiction of its sentencing courts for purposes of imposing multiple offender sentences, we affirm.
I
In 1977 Wilson was convicted by a state court in Louisiana of two counts of armed robbery. At…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Duncan v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Tuesno v. MaggioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Narvaiz v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Adhikari v. Daoud & PartnersDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Estate of Dakota Michael Anderson-Turner v. County of Lake, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- PlayUp, Inc. v. MintasDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Sensor Sys v. FAADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.