Legal Opinion

State v. Doster

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1967PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

(Pro Tempore).

The indictment charges the defendant “* * * did unlawfully and feloniously receive and conceal certain stolen property, to-wit, two outboard motors, the personal property of Oregon City Marina, Inc., a cor poration, the said PAUL ZENUS DOSTER. having good reason to believe that the said personal property had theretofore been stolen, * * * Testimony, if believed, established that two men, Bowers and Weissenbnehler, broke and entered the Marina and stole two outboard motors early in the morning. Later that day they phoned defendant and told him they had stolen two outboard motors,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. PomeroyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. CaldwellOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. CarltonOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. UptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. State v. FonteOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. SchindlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API