State of Minnesota v. Travis William Mylo Cleary
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REILLY, Judge.
Appellant probationer argues that the district court violated his’ constitutional due-process right to have a “neutral and detached” decision-maker preside at his probation revocation hearing. Because we conclude an objective, unbiased layperson with full knowledge of the facts and circumstances may reasonably question the judge’s impartiality at the probation revocation hearing, we reverse the- district court’s denial of appellant’s motion to remove the drug court judge from presiding over the probation revocation hearing, vacate the probation revocation order,- and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Conner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Derek James Saclamana v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee WestCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017