Legal Opinion
Conner v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 26, 2021No. 26/20Published
1Opinion of the Court
Effrem Antoine Conner v. State of Maryland, No. 26, September Term 2020. Opinion by Harrell, J. JUDGES – DISQUALIFICATION TO ACT – PROBLEM-SOLVING COURTS RULE – Maryland Rule 16-207 does not mandate that a trial judge assigned to a drug court program grant a motion to recuse him or her from presiding over a violation of probation proceeding for a current or former drug court participant. A trial judge’s knowledge gained from involvement in drug court, both by presiding over status hearings and communicating as a member of the drug court team, is not acquired from an extrajudicial source and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- John W. Tynan v. United States of America, Gene Z. Hanrahan v. United States of America, William T. P. Shea v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- General Motors Corp. v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.