Legal Opinion

McGovern v. Eckhart

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed April 3, 1928:

Crown hart, J.

This case was here on a former appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint, seeking to recover the penalty provided in sec. 116.04, Stats. McGovern v. Eckhart, 192 Wis. 558, 213 N. W. 332.

In that case the construction of the statutes, secs. 116.03 and 116.04, was involved, and this court, following the decision in Quiggle v. Herman, 131 Wis. 379, 111 N. W. 479, held that the giver and taker of the note were in pari delicto, and for that reason, if for no other, plaintiff could not recover the penalty. That decision is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arnd v. SjoblomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Quiggle v. HermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. McGovern v. KrausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Borosich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Roberts v. GerberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McGovern v. EckhartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. RutchikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Syvock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. HackbarthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. HeilmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API