Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. Smith

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1981No. 80-260PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Associate Judge:

Appellant, the District of Columbia, appeals from an adverse judgment entered after a jury verdict in favor of appellees Hattie Lee Smith, Pearlie Smith and Clau-die Burns, who brought an action seeking damages for mental anguish resulting from the District’s alleged negligent interference with their right to preserve, bury or otherwise dispose of the body of their brother, Casper Yeagin, at the time of his death. Appellant asserts that appellees’ failure to prove physical injury, in the circumstances of this case, precludes any recovery for damages for mental anguish.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Waldon v. CovingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Chisum v. BehrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Lott v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962
  4. Perry v. Capital Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
  5. William J. Garber and John J. Hurley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Asuncion v. Columbia Hospital for WomenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Barbara J. MacKey v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  3. James E. Gottshall v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Morgan v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Teltschik v. Williams & Jensen, PllcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API