Legal Opinion

Chisum v. Behrens

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1979No. 12502PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNDT, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, Agnes P. Hight Chisum, initiated this action to seek actual damages for mental anguish and physical illness, together with exemplary damages, following her husband’s untimely death. She alleged violation of her right to immediate possession of the body of her husband by defendants, Harry Behrens, Jon Behrens and Behrens Mortuary, Inc., and further, that defendants without her consent had made dissections and incisions into the body for the purpose of embalming.

The original complaint alleged that defendants acted recklessly and unlawfully. The trial court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Larson v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Village of IsleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. First National Bank of Jacksonville v. BragdonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Henry Carlson Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Potter v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Tibke v. McDougallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API