Legal Opinion

Asuncion v. Columbia Hospital for Women

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1986No. 85-628PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

In this medical malpractice action, appellant alleges she suffered emotional distress, but no physical harm, when she saw passing from her vagina a bloody gauze pad which appellees, her doctors, had negligently failed to remove promptly after child birth. The trial court granted summary judgment because, in this jurisdiction, there is no recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress, absent accompanying physical injury. Appellant argues: (1) this court should adopt the modern tort rule allowing recovery for negligently inflicted emotional distress…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Bass v. Nooney Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker ClinicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Williams v. BakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Jones v. Howard University, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. In Re Baby Boy C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API