Legal Opinion

State v. Moulden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 24, 1982No. [No. 48, September Term, 1980.]PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.

Melvin Moulden was charged by criminal information with armed robbery, simple robbery and related offenses. He was tried twice in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, and the

broad question before us now is whether, under all of the circumstances, further trial court proceedings are precluded by double jeopardy principles.

At the defendant’s first trial, the number of potential jurors available was insufficient to permit both the defense and the prosecution to exercise all of the peremptory challenges allotted by Maryland Rule 753 in an armed robbery prosecution. As a result, the State elected not…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Hook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Poole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Hagans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Southern Management Corp. v. TahaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API