Legal Opinion

State v. Oasheim

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1984No. Cr. 978PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

This is an appeal by the State from an order entered in the District Court of Walsh County granting the defendant, David Oasheim, a new trial. Oasheim had been found guilty by a jury of the crime of gross sexual imposition. We affirm.

Oasheim and his co-defendant, Rick Kringstad, were charged with having forcibly compelled the victim to submit to an act of sexual intercourse in violation of § 12.1— 20-03 of the North Dakota Century Code.1 The criminal complaint alleged that the crime took place between twelve o’clock midnight and twelve-thirty a.m. on July 9, 1983, in Hoople,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. Quentin Ira LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. KunkelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  5. United States v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BlalackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. JandaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. HimmerickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. KraftNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Kasprowicz v. KasprowiczNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API