Legal Opinion

Hanrick v. Hanrick

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1880No. Case No. 799PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Falls. Tried below before the Hon. L. 0. Alexander.

1Opinion of the Court

Bonner, Associate Justice.

In this case we have derived valuable aid from the elaborate briefs of counsel.

It is presented under rule 59 of this court, under the following agreement:

“It is agreed that the material allegations in plaintiffs’ amended original petition, and in defendant Edward G. Hanrick’s exceptions to the same, were substantially as follows, to wit:
“Plaintiffs alleged:
“That Edward Hanrick, the ancestor of both plaintiffs and defendant, died intestate and without issue [having never married], in Montgomery county, Alabama, in the year 1865, the sole owner of the lands described…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cain v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Scoby v. SweattTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Phillips v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Cannon's Adm'r v. VaughanTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Cryer v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1853

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hanrick v. GurleyTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Cole v. State Ex Rel. CoboliniTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  3. City of Dallas v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hanrick v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Railroad Commission v. Texas & New Orleans R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API