Town of Hull v. Massachusetts Port Authority
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
This case requires us to interpret, for the first time, the provision set forth in G. L. c. 30, § 62H, fourth par., that creates an exception to the time limit for challenges to environmental impact reports if the project proponent has “knowingly concealed a material fact or knowingly submitted false information.” The town of Hull (town) commenced an action seeking, inter alla, a judgment declaring that the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) failed to comply with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, G. L. c. 30, §§ 61-62H (MEPA), in its environmental impact report (EIR) concerning…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coveney v. President & Trustees of the College of the Holy CrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Morash & Sons, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Sawyer v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Smith v. New England Aircraft Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Connerty v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Town of Canton v. Commissioner of Massachusetts Highway DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Saxonis v. City of LynnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Evans v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2007
- Back Beach Neighbors Committee v. Town of RockportDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Classic Restaurant Concepts, LLC v. President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.