Legal Opinion

Saxonis v. City of Lynn

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 8, 2004No. 02-P-1350PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*9171. Saxonis claims that the judge erred in granting the defendants’ motion to strike her opposition to their statement of material facts, and in denying her motion to strike the defendants’ statement of facts. The judge deemed the defendants’ statement of facts admitted for the purposes of the summary judgment motion. This ruling was within the judge’s discretion and we will not disturb it. Dziamba v. Warner & Stackpole LLP, 56 Mass. App. Ct. 397, 401 (2002). Nonetheless, none of our conclusions below would be different had the judge not deemed as admitted the defendants’ statement of facts.

2.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Foley v. Polaroid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Sena v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. King v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Harrison v. NetCentric Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Damon v. HukowiczDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  2. Comeau v. Town of WebsterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  3. School Committee of Hull v. Hull Teachers Ass'nMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  4. Byrnes v. LukesMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009
  5. Hutchings v. City of GardnerMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API